Archive for the ‘sustainability’


California Gets Benefit Corporations

Sunday marked a real milestone for sustainable business: California Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 361, making benefit corporations a legal form in the nation’s largest economy.

Rather than repeating my previous post, I’ll give the bill’s author, Assemblymember Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael), the floor.

Under AB 361, he noted in announcing the signing, “businesses can choose to incorporate as benefit corporations and enjoy these significant advantages:

  • Greater access to social impact and venture capital investments;
  • Legal protection for directors and officers in their more broadly defined fiduciary roles of maximizing profits as well as ensuring social and environmental considerations; and
  • Marketing opportunities that will allow consumers to distinguish, in a very real and ascertainable fashion, between a business that claims to be socially responsible, and one that is responsible.”

What’s not to like? And there’s another aspect of this that doesn’t get enough attention: As B Lab co-founder Jay Coen Gilbert told the Los Angeles Times, traditional corporations “have one fiduciary duty: to maximize value to shareholders even if that comes at the expense of workers or the community or the environment. It’s a system that’s set up to externalize costs to society.” In other words, when corporate decisions cause environmental and social harms, the rest of us are on the hook to clean up the mess. Benefit corporations, though voluntary, are one important step toward changing all that.

Thinkshift was thrilled to support this bill, in our own name and through our work with the Green Chamber of Commerce.

Sustainability gains from gaming

The Business Council on Climate Change presented a program last week on how games are inspiring ways to get people on board with sustainable behavior change. The presenters, from Blue Shield, Sabre Holdings, SunPower and RideSpring, all had great stories to tell about how their interactive contests are inspiring people to increase their environmental efforts, get healthier, carpool more, or boost their store of knowledge about solar power.

Goals for these programs vary: improve employee and customer health (Blue Shield), boost employees’ sustainability behavior and knowledge (Sabre), increase market awareness and sales (SunPower), and expand knowledge and use of alternative transit and ridesharing among commuters (RideShare). (More info and links to programs are at the BC3 site.)

The experiences of all four reinforce what research has been telling us all along about getting people to act more responsibly in all kinds of arenas.

Make it relevant. Sabre’s Leilani Latimer noted that employees didn’t care about environmental actions at home—they wanted to know what they could do at work. Blue Shield’s Bryce Williams had similar experiences with his program.

Don’t chastise. Admonishing people for bad behavior or not fulfilling a goal almost never gets results, at least in the long term.

Go team. Competition gets intense in the Sabre and Blue Shield programs, in which participant teams compete by performing environmentally friendly or healthy behaviors. The actions are recorded and tracked online.

Peer pressure works, even if you’re not in high school. Team members pulled their own weight, and everyone reported that knowing what everyone else was doing meant people weren’t likely to cheat. Several people noted that fame—for instance, seeing your name in a company e-mail announcing winners—is a motivator.

Prizes work (if they’re coveted). Paul McGrath of RideSpring swore by regular prizes (his programs provide them via random drawings), as long as they’re good ones.

Prizes don’t work (if they’re eh). Sabre’s program offers prizes to workgroups, but they’re so small that they’re not the main motivator, said Latimer.

Make it easy. No one will do anything if it’s too complicated, time consuming or difficult. All these programs feature easy online access and simple steps.

Benefit Corporation Bill Goes to Governor

The California benefit corporation bill, AB 361, has passed through both houses of the state Legislature and is now on Governor Jerry Brown’s desk. He has 12 days to sign or veto it.

As I said in my previous post on this groundbreaking bill, AB 361 is important because as sustainable businesses grow, they often find themselves under pressure from investors to back off on elements of their mission, and if they go public, the fear of shareholder lawsuits may compel them to take actions that compromise their sustainability orientation, such as accepting a buyout offer from a suitor that doesn’t share their commitments. AB 361 has three key components that address this issue:

  • Businesses that choose to incorporate as benefit corporations must include as part of their mission creating a material positive impact on society and the environment.
  • The fiduciary duty for benefit corporations includes considering public benefits when making decisions.
  • Benefit corporations must report annually on their overall social and environmental performance using recognized third-party standards.

What would that mean, ultimately? Assemblymember Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael), who introduced the bill, put it this way:

“Socially responsible businesses, investors and consumers all over California are calling for this type of legislation. They believe this bill is the start of something transformational, that it embodies their forward thinking and entrepreneurship. But most importantly, this bill sends a message to socially minded companies and entrepreneurs that California is open for this emerging form of business.”

Thinkshift has written to the governor urging him to sign the bill. Want to send a message yourself? Get contact info and a sample letter on the Green Chamber of Commerce website.

Good News, Bad News: Paper’s Environmental Impact

As marketers, we’re acutely aware of paper use—we handle all kinds of print projects for clients, and paper appears in nearly every aspect of modern life, in packaging, personal and home products, and so on. I even own a hat made of paper (recycled).

The bad news is, paper use is on the rise globally, and North Americans use more of it per person than anybody else. The good news is, per capita use in North America is on the decline, and we’re seeing more use of recycled content and production methods that don’t use harmful chemicals.

The Environmental Paper Network (EPN) chronicles every aspect of paper production and use in its new report, State of the Paper Industry 2011. The report, aimed at policy makers, the paper and forestry industries, and large paper users, shows why changing the ways we produce and use paper is one of the best opportunities we have to reduce environmental damage.

Much of the progress is due to concerted action by the paper industry itself and watchdog and certification groups, along with demand by users such as designers (who were on board early), the packaging industry (which came later to the party, but recently has started to make a big impact), and big companies’ environmental procurement policies. Pressure on our forests is growing, despite the prevalence of digital media, but more forests are being managed sustainably or even designated off-limits.

The EPN set the baseline for statistics with it’s first report in 2007. Here are a few quick stats from this year’s report:

  • Paper accounted for 16% of waste in North American landfills in 2009, down from 26 percent in 2005.
  • The United States recycled or reused 63 percent of paper in 2009, compared with 46 percent in 2000.
  • The average North American consumed more than 500 pounds of paper per person, per year in 2010; the average European consumed just under 400 pounds a year. World average is 120 pounds per person.
  • From 2005 to 2009, the volume of paper in U.S. landfills shrank by 16 million tons to 26 million tons. That’s the equivalent of a line of trash barges almost 400 miles long.
  • In 2009, China surpassed North America in overall paper use.
  • As of July 2011, there were 791 available papers certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (the FSC provides the only certification that the EPN and environmentalists recognize as legitimate). The EPN designated only 121 papers as environmentally superior in 2010, as evaluated by its Paper Steps project.

The EPN makes a number of recommendations for making more progress, which boil down to: use less paper, and when you must, use recycled paper made with low-impact processes. Fortunately, it’s relatively easy to find papers with 100 percent recycled content; many are just as handsome as their environmentally unfriendly counterparts. Good recycled papers are available through most printers and at big box stores (I’ve found Staples has the best options for everyday office use).

California Considers Benefit Corporations

Sustainability-oriented businesses based in California may soon be able to choose a corporate form that bakes their social and environmental commitments into their legal business structure.

AB 361, introduced by North Bay Assemblymember Jared Huffman, would establish benefit corporations as a legal corporate form. The bill is scheduled for a hearing August 15 in the state Senate Appropriations Committee—its last stop before a floor vote and, if all goes well, the governor’s desk.

The bill is sponsored by B Lab, the certifier of B Corporations. If it passes and Gov. Jerry Brown signs it, AB 361 will be a milestone in B Lab’s campaign to establish the benefit corporation as a recognized legal form in all 50 states. Several states have already passed benefit corporation legislation, but given California’s size and influence, a win here would be huge.

Some people wonder why this is necessary—can’t businesses just contribute to the public good as much as they want to? Not always. As they grow, businesses that pursue social and environmental results as well as profits often find themselves under pressure from investors to back off on elements of their mission, and if they go public, the fear of shareholder lawsuits may compel them to take actions that compromise their sustainability orientation, such as accepting a buyout offer from a suitor that doesn’t share their commitments. (See this New York Times piece for cautionary tales and more on B Corporations.)

AB 361 gives businesses a way to protect their mission. It provides legal recognition for businesses that adopt higher standards of corporate purpose, accountability, and transparency—and assures that the designation means something by requiring benefit corporations to publish an annual Benefit Report following recognized third-party standards for defining, reporting, and assessing social and environmental performance. It allows directors and officers to safely consider the nonfinancial interests of the workforce, community, and environment when making decisions. Overall, B Lab says, it creates “a platform for innovative entrepreneurs to build great companies that generate high-quality jobs and economic development for communities.”

Who wouldn’t want that?

Express your support to Assemblymember Huffman. Read the bill and track its progress here (bonus: you’ll get a time-machine view of the web as it was in the beginning).