Be Upfront About Your Challenges

For companies introducing advanced technologies, one key to credible communications is honesty about the challenges you face—market barriers, infrastructure gaps, and the like. People often think they can head off market skepticism by putting on a brave (problem-free) face, but that can backfire.

  • People who understand the challenges may assume that you don’t—or that you don’t have a plan for overcoming them.
  • People who don’t understand the problem may develop false expectations, and feel misled when they learn the full story.
  • Your silence leaves skeptics free to exaggerate the problem.

Real courage calls for facing up to challenges. Do that publicly, and you’re more likely to be perceived as trustworthy and farsighted. The best approach: bring up known issues yourself, so that you can describe your plan for overcoming them, or show how the positives outweigh the negatives, or talk about why the negatives don’t apply in your case.

For Whose Convenience?

“For your convenience.” Just contemplating that phrase generates a flare of irritation and bad memories. “For your convenience, we no longer offer phone support.” “For your convenience, you must now walk around the building to enter.” “For your convenience, we can offer you a four-hour appointment window.” And so on.

I assume businesses and institutions do this because they imagine that telling us something is convenient will make us believe that it is—even if that notion runs counter to our direct experience. (I assume that because the only other alternative is to assume that they want to make an annoying situation doubly annoying by presenting it as a favor.) This is delusional, bordering on moronic.

Lying to your customers—or implying that your definition of their experience trumps theirs—is never the way to get them to support, or at least accept, new practices or difficult changes. I can’t believe I feel compelled to point this out, but the phrase appears to have become a convention—and anyone who uses it should know that it will inject an odor of bad faith into the entire customer relationship.

If you need to make a change that people won’t like, be honest, and explain why you need to do it. (Even “For our convenience …” would be better, and might generate a laugh.) If it will benefit customers in the long run, say so—as long as you have a credible case. People may still be annoyed, but at least they won’t be insulted by your dishonesty to boot.

Exaggeration Is Not Your Friend

When you’ve got a new product or service you believe will change the world—or at least your industry—naturally, you’re excited. And it’s tempting to slip into exaggeration about what you can or will do—but don’t.

Presenting goals as facts, stating best-case scenarios without qualification, hyperbole (“best,” “cleanest,” “most advanced”), and other forms of exaggeration are credibility killers.

Why? They trigger BS detectors, subjecting you to extra scrutiny. When people realize the statement is not quite true, they’ll doubt everything else you say. And they set you up for failure if you can’t deliver the best case.

Stay credible and create confidence in your enterprise by making the strongest claims that you can support. Don’t say you’ll have product on the market next year unless you absolutely know you will—give a conservative target date, and explain (briefly) what needs to happen for you to meet it. And don’t say your technology delivers the “world’s lowest emissions” or some such unless you’re prepared to back it up with an honest comparison of your performance with everyone else’s.

In short: if you can prove it, say it; if not, don’t.

Credible Green Information in Short Supply, Says Survey

Clear, credible, complete communications about green products and services is in short supply, according to recent research by the Boston Consulting Group. In the report “Capturing the Green Advantage for Consumer Companies,” they write:

There is considerable confusion around the world about what being green really means. Because the industry lacks clear definition and standards, some companies have been able to make sweeping and unsubstantiated claims about their environmental credentials. That has caused many consumers to become skeptical about green products, and companies to become wary of offering them.”

Further, consumers don’t know how to tell if a product is green or what benefits it provides, researchers found. In seeking this information, people trust independent consumer reports most, followed by academic and scientific publications and family and friends. Manufacturers and retailers are less credible, but despite that, one-half to three-fourths of people surveyed said they rely on advertising and product labels for information, even though most don’t understand the labeling or mistrust it.

Companies need to step up with credible green claims, and show how and why green benefits are relevant. Otherwise, they’re missing a huge opportunity: Researchers estimate that companies lose nearly 20 percent of potential business when they fail to adequately inform consumers about green offerings. The consumers surveyed want to be green and sustainable and they value those benefits—but they are wary of greenwashing, and few are willing to pay more for green. “Both retailers and manufacturers need to improve consumers’ awareness of green products and the choices available,” concludes the report. 

Read more about the survey findings in BCG’s press release.

State of Green Business: A Communications Wake-Up Call

GreenBiz.com released its second annual State of Green Business report Feb. 2, heralding the report’s release with a daylong forum that drew nearly 500 people from 20 states to San Francisco.

One report conclusion highlights a trend we’ve followed for over a year: green marketing is failing to communicate. While green is going mainstream, and many companies, large and small, are doing good, there’s also a lot of greenwashing. And surveys show that people are overwhelmed and befuddled by vague and conflicting claims. The report notes, “…with the new players and products has come a new wave of claims that companies aren’t doing enough, aren’t telling their stories well, or both.”

The upshot, says the report, is that “despite the continued upswing in green business activity, there’s no concomitant rise in consumer awareness or trust.” The challenge for companies is credibility. Green messages and sustainability claims need to be specific and substantiated. That will help not only with customers but also with internal audiences: The report points out that while green has had C-suite attention for years, companies are failing to engage lower ranks. Communications (backed by genuine actions) are key to bringing management and lower ranks on board. Green can make people feel good about their company.

Forum participants readily admitted that there’s little consensus about what is green. For instance, everyone is talking about the new green economy and how it will spur job creation, but the definition of a “green” job varies.

But I think we’ll soon see less greenwashing and less confusion all around. Marketers are realizing that people want credible information, and universal standards and independent verification will help. (Two recent developments: Just last month, Underwriters Laboratories announced UL Environment, its green verification service, and in 2008 the Federal Trade Commission began a serious review of its environmental marketing guidelines—a year earlier than planned, due to the storm of green marketing.)

Green is also an imperative for the new administration, confirmed panelists who provided an insider’s view during the forum’s closing session. President Obama is following through with his commitments to curb global warming and promote a green economy. And it’s not just an add-on: green policy is coming out of the White House economic team.

You can see webcasts of all the forum panels at http://www.greenbiz.com/stateofgreenbusinessforum.