Goldilocks and the Three Rules

It may not be true that everything you need to know you learned in kindergarten, but the old fairy tale Goldilocks and the Three Bears does contain three key (and often violated) rules for well-targeted communications.

Test, Test, Test Like Goldilocks, we’re all striving for “just right” communications: not too complex and not too simple, not too much and not too little. But while most of us only assume (or hope) we’ve gotten it just right, the fussy home invader knew what was just right because she tested.

Real-world testing is ideal. Is your twice-yearly magazine optimal, or would a smaller quarterly publication serve you better? Test by sending one option to half your list and the other to the rest for a year, then tallying responses or donations for each group. (There are subtleties involved in this kind of testing; this is just a broad outline.)

Wonder if you’re communicating too frequently, or too little? Ask. One client worried that they sent too many e-mail bulletins and mailings. Good thing they surveyed their audience, because they found that if anything, they could be communicating more.

Audience testing isn’t practical for everything, of course. When it isn’t—or if you just don’t have the resources for it—you can set up a battery of internal test questions to find well-grounded answers to common dilemmas.

For instance: Is long or short copy better? (The format will guide you: people will read less on a Web page than on a print page.) What do we need to get across? (To convey a clear, high-level message, don’t clutter it with detail. If you need to make a nuanced case, don’t short your credibility by leaving out supporting facts.) What does our audience want to know? (Don’t tell them more than that. And don’t tell them less—vague, hyped copy designed to “pique interest” rarely does.)

‘Just Right’ Depends on Who’s Judging Answers to your internal test questions will always depend on who your audience is. If you’re selling an expensive, advanced-technology product to businesses, for example, you’ll usually have at least two audiences: nontechnical decision makers with budget authority, and technical staff with advisory authority. Don’t think you can communicate with both in the same way: Goldilocks rejected Papa Bear’s hot porridge; he would have snarled at her tepid choice.

Don’t Fall Asleep Often the biggest mistake communications teams make is failing to regularly evaluate their messages and materials. Alas, we can’t afford to relax—what’s just right now may miss the mark as situations change. When you start to think “I could do this in my sleep,” you are asleep. You could be in for a rude awakening if someone decides to measure your communications effectiveness. Or even worse, you’ll slumber on while your audience takes their business elsewhere.

Next up: What The Three Little Pigs has to teach us about clean tech and green building. (Just kidding.)

Don’t ‘Save the Planet’

Fantasy of the day: the phrase “save the planet” will disappear from all communications urging adoption of clean technologies and sustainability initiatives. Not just because it’s a cliché, but mostly because it misrepresents the problem we face and in doing so fails to motivate action.

The planet doesn’t need us to save it. The planet will be fine without us, in whatever form we leave it; some species may even thrive in our detritus. “Without us” is the point—the problem isn’t that we are destroying the planet, but that we are destroying our ability to live well on it.

“Save the planet” is an abstraction that fails to communicate that fundamental issue. It appeals to people who would want to preserve the natural world whether we remain in it or not, and those who like to see themselves as saviors (of anything—and what’s bigger than the planet?). But these groups, and their actions, are too small to make a real difference (sorry fellow treehuggers, but it’s true).

We need communications that make the problem concrete and personal. We need to deliver the message that if we continue on our current path, we’ll be struggling to survive in a Blade Runner world.

Save the planet? Better save ourselves.

What You Say, What They Hear

Most organizations have an internal language—a patois of professional jargon, insider concepts, and in-house categories. And it should stay internal. Alas, too many broadcast their group-speak to an uncomprehending public through websites and collateral materials that attempt to persuade but often baffle.

It reminds us of a famous Far Side cartoon in which a man is earnestly lecturing his dog, who hears only “Blah blah Ginger, blah blah blah….” When your org chart defines your website’s architecture, when you use terminology that’s not widely recognized outside your organization, when you describe your products or services from your perspective rather than your target market’s perspective, your audience is likely to hear only “blah, blah, blah.”

Internal language seeps into external communications so often because it’s difficult to catch yourself using it. Few of us can switch automatically from insider to outsider language—it takes conscious effort. But it’s worth it: People usually won’t tell you they don’t understand your terminology, they’ll just make assumptions. If they don’t find information in the expected place on your website, they’ll assume it’s not there. If a word has a common meaning that differs from a particular meaning within your organization, they’ll assume the common meaning.

So make sure your message doesn’t get lost in translation: speak your audience’s language.

First published in the February 2008 issue of Words That Work.