CNGVC Site Wins W3 Award

I’m happy to report that the website we launched early this year for the California Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition won a 2009 W3 Silver Award in the green websites category—kudos to David Kerr, our design partner on the project, and congratulations to the Coalition project team. W3 awards honor outstanding websites, web advertising, and web marketing; winning entries are selected by the International Academy of the Visual Arts.

We’re especially pleased with this award because the site is model for making the most of limited resources to create a site that serves current needs, allows room to grow, and requires minimal maintenance. See my earlier post on how we did it, but in a nutshell, the keys were: a tight focus, simplicity, and a strategic plan that everyone was committed to.

A Simple, Effective Site on a Budget

The site Thinkshift just launched for the California Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition is a great example of making the most of your resources to create a site that serves current needs, allows room to grow, and requires minimal maintenance.

The Coalition had a limited budget, but urgently needed an updated site with new everything—content, design, and architecture. The new site has a strong focus, delivers substantial information, and is easy to maintain. The keys to making this project work:

Focus on key needs. A tight budget means a tight (small, targeted, concise) site—you can’t address everything. The Coalition is a member-based advocacy organization, so we focused on supporting advocacy priorities, promoting membership, and serving members. Period.

Use what you have. We were able to adapt copy written for a previous legislator information packet to create the “Why NGVs?” section. Without this running start, the organization would not have been able to provide such robust information.

Keep the design simple. Most of us love a bit of flash (or Flash), but when you’re on a budget, you need to keep your design specifications clean and focus on the user experience (rather than impressing people with flourishes). Even on a budget, you can get a good-looking, audience-appropriate, user-centered site as long as you are disciplined about limiting your options. Focusing on what’s going to make the site easiest and most engaging for users spurs creative, economical solutions.

Build for the future. The site architecture is extremely simple, with only five top-level navigation categories that are broad enough to accommodate all anticipated additions over the next several years. The site can grow deeper with ease, without changing the basic structure. A front-page feature and secondary navigation let us bring deep information to the fore when appropriate, without disturbing the simplicity of the home page.

Account for maintenance upfront. We addressed maintenance in our site creative brief—there’s no point in building a site you don’t have the capacity to maintain, and even the simplest site needs a maintenance plan. Without one, updates are likely to be sporadic, and effectiveness will nosedive.

When to Go Negative

“Focus on what you do for them. Show how you solve their problem. Benefits, benefits, benefits.” We—and pretty much every other marketing communications consultant—say that all the time. Perhaps too often, and without enough caveats, recent conversations with a client lead me to believe.

If your audience doesn’t believe they have a problem, for example, they’re unlikely to be moved by your solution.  And if you’re trying to create a sense of urgency, you’re unlikely to succeed with a single-minded focus on benefits. Ample research in behavioral economics shows that fear of loss is a much stronger motivator than desire for gain.

What this means: sometimes you have to go negative. Selling water conservation technologies in a rainy region? Your first task is to convince people that wasting water is a problem. Want people to act now? Talk about what they’ll lose if they don’t—in the strongest terms you can support.

Don’t Tempt Me

“The only way to get rid of temptation is to yield to it … I can resist everything but temptation.” —Oscar Wilde

It’s tempting to cram everything that can be said about your product, program, or service into every communication about it. That way, you can satisfy all the internal agendas and answer any question that might occur to anyone.

But yielding to temptation ultimately didn’t work out well for Oscar Wilde, and it probably won’t for you either. Asking your audience to wade through a river of detail to find the bit they want (not to mention the bit you want them to get) is making them work, and people generally expect to get paid for that.

Make it easy for people to understand what you’re offering and how it will benefit them: address them directly and clearly, and don’t let extraneous bits obscure your message. That means resisting the engineer or other detail-obsessed insider who insists that everything is important, and leaders who can’t see that, frankly, your target audience doesn’t give a damn about their hobbyhorses.

It doesn’t mean paring your pitch down to lofty generalities (a sure way to raise greenwashing suspicions). The trick is to isolate essential and powerful details and let them shine. How do you do that? Find out what your target audience cares about and speak directly to that, with verifiable claims. Anything more will tempt them to tune out.

Does Quality Really Matter?

We’ve spent our careers championing quality—and we’ll continue to do so, despite the sometimes quixotic nature of the quest. Why? For starters, the quality of your communications reflects the quality of your work. It sends the message that you’re credible and trustworthy.

Quality content, in particular, is important if you’re addressing new technologies, emerging markets, or skeptical audiences (the clean tech sector faces all three challenges).

First-rate content delivers crystal-clear information about your services or products, your values, and why you’re different or better—and backs up those claims with facts and concrete examples. This is critical in a website, organization brochure, or other materi­als that introduce you to key audiences. People aren’t going to buy your pitch just because you say it’s so.

Homework: Not Just for Kids
That’s why, when developing critical communications for clients, we make sure everyone does their homework, so we have the information needed to clearly convey benefits and value and provide substantive information rather than vague claims. We also make sure the design serves the information and reflects the personality and values of the organization.

Getting Away With Good Enough
Can you ever get away with “good enough”? Even we have to admit that sometimes, the answer is yes. With a one-time handout or a simple, event-specific website, for instance, you don’t need to add to your workload with elaborate planning and complex execution. Just know what you need to say and the results you need, and cre­ate only what you need to accomplish the task—no more.

One organization, for instance, recently sent an HTML e-mail an­nouncing a few upcoming teleconfer­ences. The design wasn’t great and the copy had a first-draft feel. But they didn’t need more. They’re a pretty ca­sual group, the message was sent to people who already knew them, and the content was fundamentally sound: the class descriptions were engaging and the message clear. On the other hand, the teleclass message probably did nothing to raise anyone’s esteem for the group. And if this were the first contact we had with the organization, we wouldn’t think too highly of it.

When You Care Enough …
Good-quality design, active writing (free from errors), and substantive content send the message that you care about your audience and you care about what you do. Quality communications are compelling because they speak clearly to your target audience and reflect what your company is all about. Sloppy copy, weak content, and poor design convey exactly the opposite.

So, if you want to attract discerning customers, educate skeptics, or win converts to your cause, it pays to put your best foot forward. First published in Words That Work, October 2007.