Universities: Don’t Be So Modest About Sustainability

Universities are not generally known as hotbeds of modesty, but you’d never guess that by looking at university sustainability websites.

One of the most common flaws is a lack of focus on what the university is doing, and how its institutional values and educational commitments influence its approach to sustainability. Instead, many sites speak in generalities about what sustainability is (I’ve lost count of the number of sites that quote the U.N. definition on their home page or in another prominent position), why it’s important, and what people can do about it.

The problem is, there are countless resources online for that kind of information, and generalities on why it matters don’t engage people in sustainability initiatives. When key audiences come to a university site they want to know what actions the university is taking, how those actions relate to the university’s mission and community responsibilities, and how people on campus can participate. That’s why, as I said in a previous post, the best sites put school policies, goals, and strategy front and center.

If you’re going to define sustainability, do it in terms of what it means to Whatever U. Describe why efforts in each sustainability area are important in Whatever U’s context (cold winters, water shortages, etc.). Tailor tips to campus goals and your specific audiences (there’s little point in telling students who live in dorm rooms how much carbon they can cut by weatherizing their home). And cite your achievements—they tell people that your sustainability message is more than talk.

University Sustainability Sites: Getting Beyond 101

Universities can play a central role in creating a more sustainable way of life, not only by nurturing innovators and educating the next generation in sustainability concepts and technologies, but also by modeling sustainable systems on campus.

Most of the universities we’ve talked with recognize this, and are taking meaningful steps in those areas. They often don’t communicate well about their efforts, however—we’ve reviewed quite a few campus sustainability sites in the course of our university work (for an example of that, see our Stanford project profile), and found many a poor stepchild or filing cabinet.  We’ve also found some that do it right. In honor of graduation season, here are the hallmarks of excellent sustainability sites:

  • Achievements are foremost
  • School policies, goals, and strategy are front and center
  • Reports and facts are easily accessed
  • News is prominent and current
  • Content is deep, with overviews for people who want the basics and details for those who want to dig in
  • Organization is logical for external audiences
  • There are easy ways to take action or access action info in top navigation
  • Language is clear, direct, and free from jargon and insider terms
  • Users are sent off the site as little as possible

Sites that hit these marks are most likely to engage the campus community and impress prospective students and faculty. We’ll address them in more detail in future posts.

Article Shows How Credible Content Delivers

Think that substantive, credible content goes unnoticed? Just check out this article opener: “Should anyone question Stanford’s commitment to sustainability, point them to the ‘Sustainable Stanford’ website. Then watch their jaw drop.”

The article, the cover feature in the current issue of Sustainability: The Journal of Record, goes on to repeat Stanford’s sustainability messages—verbatim in some cases—and quotes liberally from key facts and figures on the site.

Strong website content serves two purposes: it gives the sustainability program a high degree of control over information, and it provides a deep resource for writers. And strong information architecture makes that content easy to find: the Stanford site presents information in ways external audiences expect rather than according to internal categories.

Needless to say, we’re extremely proud of our client for getting such great PR, and happier still that the website we developed for them last year is serving them so well. Kudos, too, to the creative team at 1185 Design, which partnered with us for design and development.

A Simple, Effective Site on a Budget

The site Thinkshift just launched for the California Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition is a great example of making the most of your resources to create a site that serves current needs, allows room to grow, and requires minimal maintenance.

The Coalition had a limited budget, but urgently needed an updated site with new everything—content, design, and architecture. The new site has a strong focus, delivers substantial information, and is easy to maintain. The keys to making this project work:

Focus on key needs. A tight budget means a tight (small, targeted, concise) site—you can’t address everything. The Coalition is a member-based advocacy organization, so we focused on supporting advocacy priorities, promoting membership, and serving members. Period.

Use what you have. We were able to adapt copy written for a previous legislator information packet to create the “Why NGVs?” section. Without this running start, the organization would not have been able to provide such robust information.

Keep the design simple. Most of us love a bit of flash (or Flash), but when you’re on a budget, you need to keep your design specifications clean and focus on the user experience (rather than impressing people with flourishes). Even on a budget, you can get a good-looking, audience-appropriate, user-centered site as long as you are disciplined about limiting your options. Focusing on what’s going to make the site easiest and most engaging for users spurs creative, economical solutions.

Build for the future. The site architecture is extremely simple, with only five top-level navigation categories that are broad enough to accommodate all anticipated additions over the next several years. The site can grow deeper with ease, without changing the basic structure. A front-page feature and secondary navigation let us bring deep information to the fore when appropriate, without disturbing the simplicity of the home page.

Account for maintenance upfront. We addressed maintenance in our site creative brief—there’s no point in building a site you don’t have the capacity to maintain, and even the simplest site needs a maintenance plan. Without one, updates are likely to be sporadic, and effectiveness will nosedive.

Write for an Attention-Deficit Age

We could spend all day disproving the notion that nobody reads anymore, but it is true that in our multitasking, information-overload world, it’s harder to attract and hold a business audience than it once was. Here are a few tips to grab attention in an attention-deficit age:

Break the mold. Examine how similar organizations communicate, and do something different. Find an unusual angle. Be warmer or more analytical, more casual or more sophisticated—whatever everyone else is not. And ditch the jargon—buzzwords are a way to fit in, not to stand out.

Strike an emotional chord. Focus on what moves, excites, inspires, or alarms. What will get the strongest gut response? Not sure? Think about how you’d talk about it with an attractive stranger at a party.

Just say it. Bland, heavily qualified statements may head off controversy, but they also induce narcolepsy. Say what you mean, clearly and assertively, and support it. People will take notice. And if they take exception? That’s an opportunity for dialogue.

Be relevant. If your content isn’t of interest to your audience, you’ll lose them. Provide information readers want and you’ll keep them with you.

Use snappy display copy. If the most eye-catching copy on the page is dull, why would anyone read the small print? Strong display copy grabs readers; treating it as an afterthought is a mistake.

Underlying these strategies is a key principle: be compelling. And “compelling” means compelling to your audience, not necessarily to you or your organization. Cater to your readers’ interests and you’ll get their attention. First published in the March 2008 issue of Words That Work.